Editorially Double Speaking

As an integral aspect of a floundering economy, bureaucratic pragmatism manifests itself into a randomized depiction of introspective transgressions. These manifestations harvest themselves beyond the intended fervor and aggregate to a new level of administrative corruption. Establishing a policy of tepid appeasement unequivocally denies the far-reaching influence perceived in impromptu conclusions. In so much as one encapsulates a framework derived from adjunct certainty, we ascertain that objective interpretations must be inherently different in distinction to abstract reality.

One charts the surging tedium entwined in the weathered mindset of public opinion and reinforces the conceptual differences between the government and its people. In a world such as this, the variance perpetuates an infinite amount of retrospective behavior from the revisionist, but remains mired in the inner sanctum of the intolerant. No longer can we endure an ambiguous approach to issues that have limpid solutions or ignore the ill-fated promulgation proclaiming self-righteousness.  We need to acquiesce to our beliefs and delineate  an acknowledgment of our limitations for it is we who determine the prodigious supply of stimulus required to co-exist.

                                         pjh